Maria Miller: I am happy to accept Labour’s amendment on a speedy civil partnerships review
Confirming what a senior source in her department had told PinkNews.co.uk earlier, the Minister for Equalities Maria Miller has told the House of Commons that she will accept Labour’s manuscript amendment on civil partnerships.
Earlier, a senior Government source told PinkNews.co.uk that the Equalities Minister Maria Miller is “relaxed” on an immediate review on opposite sex civil partnerships.
Labour MPs have been threatening to vote in favour of Conservative MP Tim Loughton’s amendment to the Marriage (Same sex couples) Bill that would immediate introduce opposite sex civil partnerships. It is supported by many Conservative MPs who oppose same-sex marriage as it is believed that it could “wreck” the progress of the bill in the House of Lords.
Mrs Miller had already offered to hold a review of civil partnerships within five years. The review could consider whether to allow opposite sex couples to hold civil partnerships or ‘grandfather’ them, in other words stopping any further same-sex civil partnerships to be entered into while allowing existing civil partnerships to retain their distinct status.
Mrs Miller told Parliament that she is “happy to accept Labour’s amendment” and said that she would initiate a consultation on introducing opposite civil partnerships “very speedily.”
She said that there is a “clear and glaring” inequality for same-sex couples and that remains her priority to remedy. She said that “same-sex couples have waited a very long time” to be able to marry.
A source told PinkNews.co.uk that the Government’s priority is to introduce same-sex marriage but it was prepared to conduct a review of civil partnerships “sooner rather than later” if it was the “will of Parliament.” The source stressed that the Government has no developed policy on civil partnerships and that there “would need to be a lot of policy work”, before making any concrete proposals on the issue.
PinkNews.co.uk’s source said that simply introducing opposite sex civil partnerships without a consultation would be irresponsible, not least because of the implications for pension rights and overseas relationship recognition.
