Interview: London Assembly Labour member Tom Copley on Boris, Tories and better sex ed
Tom Copley became the youngest person ever to join the London Assembly when he was elected as a Labour member in 2012. Speaking to PinkNews.co.uk, the City Hall Labour housing spokesperson talks the Tories, Russia, holding Boris to account, and the need for better sex and relationship education in schools.
Tom Copley finds himself in something of a unique position amongst his peers: Last year, the openly gay 28-year-old found himself elected to one of the most prominent positions in London, becoming a Labour member for the London Assembly. As part of the bodyās Economy, Housing & Regeneration and Transport committees, he has unrivalled insight into the workings of the Greater London Authority, and of Boris Johnson himself.
āI was delighted to get elected ā I wasnāt expecting to get elected itās fair to say, though I was very pleased that I did,ā Mr Copley says, adding: āIn terms of being gay, the Assembly actually has had gay members since the very beginning, and I think thatās testament to what a diverse place London is.
āI think being the youngest, perhaps I bring a slightly different perspective to certain issuesā¦ I hope Iāve been able to raise some things that wouldnāt have been raised otherwise.ā
Mr Copley has certainly used his position to help raise many of the gay communityās concerns as well as keeping the Mayor himself in check. āWhen we had all the issues around World Pride I raised a number of things with Boris Johnson,ā he says, āand again going forward to the London Pride that we had this year, keeping a close eye on whatās going on and making sure that the mistakes of the past werenāt repeated.
āAlso challenging the Mayor over things like the gifts heās been given by the Mayor of Sochi. Obviously with the big issues with gay rights in Russia at the moment, Iāve asked him if heāll give those gifts back, and actually he hasnāt properly answered the question yet.ā
Asked what gifts the Mayor has been receiving, Mr Copley says: āThey were only little things, token kind of gifts. I forget what they are but theyāre quite small things, but I think symbolically it would be a good thing for him to return them.ā
Just two weeks ago, Boris Johnson said it would be wrong to end the twinning arrangement between London and Moscow over Russiaās controversial new anti-gay āpropagandaā laws, saying: āI believe that we can better challenge prejudice through engagement. Isolation will not achieve change.ā Does Mr Copley agree that the capital should continue to have cultural ties with Russia in the wake of its crackdown on the LGBT community?
āWell, the twinning arrangement is an interesting one,ā he replies, ābecause Londonās twinned with a number of places, some of which have worse records on gay rights that Russia. Weāre twinned with Kingston in Jamaica ā in Jamaica youāll go to prison for ten years. Weāre twinned with a city in Pakistan where again homosexuality is illegal. Weāre also twinned with Beijing where although itās not illegal, itās hardly a beacon of gay equality. So I think one has to be consistent.ā
He goes on to add however: āThe only argument one could make about Russia is that they are I believe signatory to various European conventions which theyāre in breach of with their law. So I guess thatās possibly an argument you could make to be an exception, but I think it is a slightly more difficult issue.ā
Mr Copley has been critical of Boris Johnson in the past, telling PinkNews last year that the Mayor only pays ālip serviceā to LGBT issues, and questioning why he had failed to produce an Out4Marriage video (a promise he eventually fulfilled in August 2012). Though he struggles to gauge the sincerity of Borisās new-found support of gay rights, the Labour member believes it can only be a positive thing.
He says: āI always like to give people the benefit of the doubt, however itās difficult to know whether itās sincere. I mean it wasnāt just the two men and a dog thing, I believe heād written some other rather unsavoury things, particularly in The Spectator in the 1990s. I think I would compare him to his predecessor, Ken Livingstone, and Ken Livingstone was going on gay pride marches before I was born, and I think very sincerely wanted to stand up for gay rights. Boris doesnāt have that record, but I completely welcome the fact that he now does speak out very strongly for gay rights, I think thatās testament to how things have shifted.ā
Mr Copley partly attributes that shift in attitudes to the initiatives taken by Labour during its thirteen years in government: āObviously thereās the very practical things we did policy-wise like civil partnerships and adoption rights, equalising the age of consent, but I almost think the biggest achievement we made is the transformation, certainly of the leadership, of the Tory party if not the grassroots, to the point where itās actually been a Conservative Prime Minister whoās introduced equal marriage, and he should take credit for that.
āEven if he couldnāt bring his whole party with him, it was a brave thing to do.ā
While some in the Tory party have used the passing of equal marriage to disparage Labourās record on the issue, Mr Copley says that those people āshould hang their heads in shame, because Labour was transformative on gay rights.ā
Another, slightly more unfortunate, transformation that has occurred recently is the Greater London Authorityās (GLA) tumble down the rankings of Stonewallās Workplace Equality Index since Mr Johnson took over the top job in 2008: āI think itās pretty bad that itās slumped down from 2nd to 278th. I think thatās possibly down to the fact that I think that where Ken Livingstone had a real focus on equalities and took them very seriously ā not just gay equality but race equality, womenās equality, all these issues ā I think perhaps Boris has had less of a focus on that, and thatās why weāve fallen down the list.
āItās certainly not a homophobic place to work at all, but could it do better in terms of LGB equality ā yes absolutely.ā
Mr Copley, who worked on Ken Livingstoneās successful campaign in 2010 to be selected as Labourās mayoral candidate, might use the former mayor as a point of contrast to Boris, but what does he make of the backlash Mr Livingstone faced from some quarters of the gay community over his meetings with homophobic Islamic clerics?
āI disagree with Ken over al-Qaradari, I donāt think he should have been invited to City Hall. Ken did it all in good faith and in the belief that it was a way of improving relations with the Muslim community. I disagree with him on that particular issue but I donāt think any of that should detract from his very vocal support over the years for gay rights. āLike I say, he was on gay pride marches before I was born. He used to be vilified by the press in the 1980s: no leading politician would do it except for Ken. I think he made it easier for politicians subsequently.
āI mean this was a time in the 80s when closeted gay Tory MPs were going to the lobbies to vote for Section 28 and then would be drinking in gay bars later in the evening,ā he continues. āSo there was an awful lot of hypocrisy. Iām not saying it was easy at the time to be an openly gay politician, not at all, but I think Kenās actions did help politicians subsequently to be more vocal in support for gay rights.
āIāll always admire him for that,ā he adds.
Away from the politics of the GLA, the 28-year-old is a strong advocate of sex and relationship education, undoubtedly one of the key issues facing LGBT youth today in the face of record HIV infection rates.
When I ask him whether parents should have the right to withdraw their children from classes discussing sex and same-sex relationships, Mr Copley is unequivocal: āI think children have a right to learn about these things and to make their own judgements. There is a balance to be struck, but would we tolerate parents taking their children out of a history class because they didnāt agree with a particular thing being taught? I donāt think we would. I think that the childās right to know in this case trumps the parentsā rights.ā
Saying that compulsory sex education should start early at an āappropriate level,ā Mr Copley recognises that such education must be attuned to the challenges of the 21st century, echoing Nick Cleggās concerns that sex and relationship guidance ā which was last updated 13 years ago ā is out of touch with the needs of the new technological generation.
āI think we need much more comprehensive sex education, because kids ā particularly now with the internet and everything ā a lot of children are learning about sex because of pornography, and I donāt think thatās a very good place to learn about sex or indeed relationships. So I think you need that comprehensive sex education in schools.
āThere is pressure on young people to send explicit photos of themselves to others, and I think there is particular pressure on young gay men,ā Mr Copley explains. āThe big problem is, once a photo is out there you canāt take it back. I imagine that a great many may one day regret hitting āsendā. Modern sex and relationship education ought to address this issue. Unfortunately it currently does not.ā
Passionate, confident, and already a political high-flyer before the age of 30, I ask the Mr Copley if we can expect to see him running to be Londonās first openly gay mayor in the near future.
āCertainly not this time, goodness me!ā he laughs, before adding: āItās a good idea never to rule anything out, and I certainly wouldnāt rule it out in the future. It is I think a fantastic job to have.
āWhat I would hope is that post-2016, assuming we have a Labour mayor and assuming I manage to get myself re-elected to the assembly, I would hope to have some sort of role to play in a Labour administration ā but of course thatās up to whoever wins!ā