Left-wing magazine boss says gender reforms will lead to bearded men exposing their penises to women
There has been a shocking backlash following the government announcing its plans to streamline and de-medicalise the process for changing gender.
Helen Lewis, the deputy editor of the New Statesman, wrote in The Times today to criticise the idea that people should be able to define their own gender.
Days after Jeremy Corbyn called for an overhaul of the 2004 Gender Recognition Act at the PinkNews Summer Parliamentary reception, the government announced it would move to allow transgender people to change their legal gender.
The current law requires trans people to pass a number of bureaucratic hurdles, wait two years and to submit to medical tests in order to change their legal gender.
Corbyn backed trans campaigners in calling for a āself-declarationā system which would eliminate many of the obstacles.
But Lewis objected, comparing gender to nationality and stating that āyou might feel British and wish to spend the rest of your life in Britain, but thereās still a formal process to go through to become a citizen.
āCrucially, once youāve completed that process, youāre as British as someone who was born here.
āItās not a perfect model, but itās the least worst one we have.ā
Unless you marry a British citizen, it takes five years to achieve naturalisation.
Writer and campaigner Juno Roche rubbished Lewisās comments, drawing attention instead to the dangers faced by trans women all over the world.
āWhilst some speculate wildly about what may happen if trans people are allowed far more freedom in relation to self-identification and how dangerous they perceive us to be ā as they do that, people, real people, trans people are dying.
āLook at the numbers globally of trans women ā mainly TWOC (trans women of colour) ā contracting HIV, through structural and systemic discrimination and societal neglect.
āClaims about us as perpetrators of crimes against women are factually wrong, but are also made out of pure and simple spite.ā
The Sunday Times also sparked a negative reaction with the way in which it reported the governmentās proposals this weekend.
Tim Shipman and Jason Allardyce wrote: āAdults will be able to change their gender legally without a doctorās diagnosis under government plans that will transform British society.
āMen will be able to identify themselves as women ā and women as men ā and have their birth certificates altered to record their new gender.ā
Women would identify as women ā and men as men ā under the new plans, which acknowledge trans rights.
Lewis was also worried about the governmentās proposals increasing the number of male flashers in womenās changing rooms.
āIn this climate, who would challenge someone with a beard exposing their penis in a womenās changing room?ā she asks.
Similar arguments ā about how trans people might abuse the ability to use their bathroom of choice ā have been used to battle against trans rights in the US.
On Sunday, as the UK government was making its announcement about the reforming the Gender Recognition Act, the Texas Senate State Affair Committee passed Senate Bill 3.
The Bill forces people to use the bathroom that corresponds with the gender they were assigned at birth.
Paul Embery, a Fire Brigades Union official, also came out against the governmentās plan, comparing gender identity to weight, height and attractiveness.
Coming next: short people may identify as tall, fat people may identify as thin, and ugly people may pretend to be George Clooney. pic.twitter.com/Crxau2dZtz
ā Paul Embery (@PaulEmbery) July 23, 2017
People hit back after Lewisās article.
Hi Helen, as a cis woman and a feminist Iād expect you to not occupy debates on trans rights with fear based argts of indecent exposureā¦
ā NoĆ©mie Ducret (@ncjducret) July 25, 2017
Helen Lewisās repeated comparison of trans rights to the UK immigration system (arguing the latter = āthe least worst optionā) is *so bad* pic.twitter.com/IhaNEs1jAB
ā [pasta emoji] (@pastachips) July 25, 2017
Some were furious.
I wish I could get paid ludicrous amounts of money to dehumanise Helen Lewis on a daily basis. Free speech means equal debate, right?
ā āāļø ā§ Alex ā§ āāļø (@winterslex) July 25, 2017