Republican governor Kristi Noem launches TV ad attacking trans kids to win votes

South Dakota governor Kristi Noem speaks at a podium while dressed in a green outfit

South Dakota governor Kristi Noem has continued to wage an anti-trans campaign in the state, releasing an advert targeting student-athletes.

The ad, released on Wednesday (13 January), promotes a bill that effectively bans trans women and girls from playing on school sports teams aligned with their gender identity.

Noem declared on Twitter her bill will give ā€œSouth Dakota the strongest law protecting female sports in the nationā€. LGBT+ rights advocates have called it just another example of her “discriminatory rhetoric”.

The ad, which doesnā€™t directly mention trans people, began with the claim that ā€œonly girls play girlsā€™ sportsā€ in South Dakota.

“Why? Because of governor Kristi Noem’s leadership,ā€ it added. ā€œNoem has been protecting girls’ sports for years and never backed down.ā€

The 30-second ad, which also promotes Noemā€™s 2022 re-election campaign, claims that the governorā€™s ā€œsteady, conservative leadership doesnā€™t win headlinesā€ but allegedly ā€œwins resultsā€.

Noem has long opposed allowing trans students to participate in school sports that align with their gender identity.

She vetoed a previous trans sports ban in March after it passed through the South Dakota legislature, claiming the legislatureā€™s version of the bill couldā€™ve left the state open to lawsuits and backlash from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).

Afterwards, Noem issued two executive orders to ban trans athletes from participating in girlsā€™ and womenā€™s sports teams at public high schools and universities.

In December, she filed draft legislation of a bill that would codify her anti-trans executive orders.

House Bill 1006 and Senate Bill 46 both would prevent trans girls from playing on girlsā€™ sports teams in South Dakota.

The Republican-dominated Senate State Affairs committee passed Senate Bill 46 on Friday (14 January) and now moves to the full Senate for debate.

Jett Jonelis, advocacy manager for the ACLU of South Dakota, said the bill is attempting to ā€œsolve a problem that does not existā€ while also ā€œslamming the door shutā€ for trans student-athletes to ā€œfully participate in their school communitiesā€.

ā€œTransgender students participate in sports for the same reasons other young people do: to challenge themselves, to stay fit and healthy and to be a part of a team,ā€ Jonelis said. ā€œTrans studentsā€™ humanity, dignity, and ability to be full members of their school communities should never be up for debate like this.ā€

Jennifer Phalen, whose trans daughter wants to participate in school gymnastics, told the committee that passage of the bill would ā€œdirectly hurt childrenā€, the Associated Press reported.

ā€œIt would directly hurt my daughter and take away her freedom to participate in activities with her peers,ā€ she said.

She continued: ā€œAs a parent, I donā€™t really care if she becomes an elite athlete, but I want her to have the experiences of being on a team.ā€

South Dakota lawmakers have also introduced a third anti-trans bill, House Bill 1005, this year.

HB 1005 would allow cisgender students to sue schools if a trans student uses multi-occupancy public school facilities that affirm their gender. This includes bathrooms, shower facilities, changing rooms and sleeping facilities.

According to the ACLU of South Dakota, the bill has been assigned to the House State Affairs Committee and is awaiting a hearing date.