Why Suella Braverman as home secretary paints a bleak future for human rights
Suella Braverman’s appointment as home secretary is vastly concerning given her “divisive politics”, attacks on trans rights and support for repealing human rights law.
Braverman was named home secretary by Liz Truss on Tuesday evening (6 September).
She will take over from Priti Patel, who held the position since 2019 and announced her resignation on Monday (5 September).
Before the announcement was made,Ā Micro Rainbow CEO Sebastian Rocca described Bravermanās widely-expected appointment as ānot good newsā.
He highlighted Bravermanās history of ādivisive politicsā, a āpoor voting track record on LGBTQI rightsā and previous anti-trans comments.Ā
āIt reminds me of Priti Patelās lack of empathy and humanity,ā Rocca said. āI hope I will be proved wrong.ā
Suella Braverman set the benchmark for the Tory leadership race.
Braverman was the first person to jump into the Tory leadership race to succeed Boris Johnson, launchingĀ her short-lived Tory leadership run by saying Britain needs to āget rid of all this woke rubbishā.
Braverman failed to make it past the second ballot of Tory MPs, but in many ways her words set the tone of the race.
Both Truss and runner-up Rishi Sunak used hustings to be critical of trans rights, and both evenĀ denied trans women are womenĀ during a hustings in August.
Braverman’s record as attorney general paints a troubling picture
In July, she suggested Westminster could block Scotlandās long-promised and life-saving reform of the Gender Recognition Act, arguing it would create a ātwo-tier systemāĀ within the UK.Ā
Braverman recited a number of anti-trans talking points, saying she thinks a ārights cultureā has āspun out of controlā in the UK. She claimed thereās a ācollective frenzyā over trans rights which meant the ābasics of biologyā have been āturned upside downā.Ā
Braverman said in a speech before the Policy Exchange in August that schools in the UK could beĀ āindoctrinating childrenā, andĀ that āmisinformedā teachers are āsocially transitioningā pupils.
She also claimed it was ālawfulā for schools to deadname and misgender trans pupils as well as deny them access to certain toilets or to play some sports activities.Ā
Robin White, the only openly trans woman in the country to work as a discrimination barrister, toldĀ PinkNews the rights of trans youth are protected by law ā despite what Braverman might say.
Suella Braverman’s statements on how to solve the UK’s immigration ‘problem’ give bleak outlook on future.
Braverman suggested during her campaign run that the only way the UK can solve its immigrationĀ āproblemā and ensure Brexit is ādeliveredā is to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).Ā
She described the ECHR ā which protects human rights and political freedoms in Europe ā as āinterventionistā and āpoliticisedā.Ā
Removing the UK from the ECHR is difficult because the rights of the body were incorporated into the nation’s law in 1998 through the Human Rights Act. The ECHR was also enshrined within part of the Good Friday agreement, which was a peace agreement signed by the British and Irish governments.
One of the reasons why Conservatives have targeted the ECHR as of late is because of the UK’s egregious Rwanda policy.Ā
There was an immense outcry when Patel’s Home Office announced it would send migrants who arrive via the English Channel, to Rwanda, putting the lives of LGBTQ+ asylum seekers in jeopardy.Ā
However, the inaugural flight of asylum seekers to Rwanda was abandoned at the last minute after a ruling by the ECHR. The legality of the policy is now being tested in aĀ full hearing by the High Court.Ā
In August, Suella Braverman declared it was a ānational priorityāĀ for the UK to break ties with the ECHR. She also took aim at what she described as a āculture where fringe campaign groups, purporting to champion rights, have claimed a moral high ground and have adopted an attitude of intoleranceā.Ā
āEquality laws have been misconstrued and weaponised to fight those who challenge their views as perpetrators of hate speech, calling for them to be swiftly no-platformed or cancelled,ā she added.Ā