House of Representatives debate on trans healthcare descends into pure transphobia
Republicans in the House of Representatives have been criticised for making anti-trans comments during a debate on gender-affirming care.
New York representative Jerrold Nadler said that the debate on Thursday (27 July) had descended into a platform for politicians to bully transgender youngsters, after several remarks were made opposing trans healthcare.
Republican members of the House Judiciary Committeeās sub-committee on the constitution and limited government spoke about āthe dangers and due-process violations of gender-affirming care for childrenā, with several branding the medical care dangerous, Advocate reported.
Their comments came despite numerous studies proving that gender-affirming care can actually improve the mental health of trans teenagers.
āNo parent has a constitutional right to injure their children,ā representative Mike Johnson, from Louisiana, said during the hearing, describing trans healthcare as ābarbarismā.
He added: āThe modern left applauds men competing in womenās college athletics. We see universities captured by academics advancing this ideology on students across our country.
āItās an aggressive attempt to transition the young people of our country. Theyāre doing this psychologically, and now theyāre doing it even physically. Something has gone terribly wrong.ā
Republicans called four witnesses, including a director from the right-wing evangelical group, Family Research Council, who criticised gender-affirming care.
Texas representative Wesley Hunt compared gender-affirming care to a child being able to eat ice cream for every meal, claiming trans children are too young to be able to make decisions about their own bodies.
āIf my children had their way, they would have ice cream for breakfast, lunch and dinner, and for every meal in between. Oh, the wisdom of children,ā he said.
āBut in a sane country, we know that children arenāt mature enough to make adult decisions that will impact the rest of their lives. Thatās why we have parents.ā
He added that doctors who support gender-affirming care have āabsolutely lost their mindsā, comparing it to āchild mutilationā.
Democrat Nadler voiced his disgust at the anti-trans remarks, which he described as bullying.
āWhat we are witnessing today is nothing less than a taxpayer-funded platform for congressional Republicans to bully transgender kids who are already some of the most vulnerable members of our community. Things are already tough enough for these kids and their parents,ā he said.
āI trust parents and medical professionals, not politicians, to make decisions about their childrenās health when it comes to gender-affirming care, and so does the constitution.ā
Fellow Democrat, Pennsylvania congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon, added that the hearing was ānot about protecting childrenās or parentsā rightsā, but instead had devolved into a ācynical and dangerous political attack on transgender children and their familiesā.
Several states across the US have attempted to ban or limit gender-affirming care for young trans people, with the Human Rights Campaign tracking 132 bans introduced across the country so far this year.
The organisation claimed that 19 bans have become law in states including Tennessee, Mississippi, Texas and Florida.
Several states have seen legislation overturned, however, with judges rejecting bans in Indiana and Arkansas, and an extreme bill that would have banned gender-affirming care for adults and young people was struck down in Missouri.
The World Health Organization has previously spoken about the importance of adequate gender-affirming care provision, urging countries to āremove structural barriersā to trans peopleās healthcare.
How did this story make you feel?