Donald Trump’s grim LGBTQ+ views explored – could he reverse hard-won civil rights?

Donald Trump

At the time of writing, it seems almost inevitable that Donald Trump will become the 47th President of the United States, meaning LGBTQ+ rights are under serious threat.

The election was one of the closest in history according to voting polls over the past few weeks, with polling group FiveThirtyEight reporting that Harris just barely reached a 1.2 per cent lead on Trump a day before the results were counted.

The Trump-Vance Republican ticket has been vocal and incredibly negative about the LGBTQ+ community in recent weeks, constantly pushing anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and promising to enact abhorrent policies.

The last Trump presidency led to a roll-back of protections and anti-discrimination laws for LGBTQ+ people, and it doesn’t look as if a second term would be any different if he is re-elected, based on campaign promises and the detailed policy proposals outlined in Project 2025 – although Trump has tried to distance himself from the right-wing proposals.

In anticipation of a Trump win, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) suggested a new Trump administration would “reinstate and significantly escalate the removal of anti-discrimination policies… proactively require discrimination by the federal government [and] weaponise federal law against transgender people across the country”.

So, what are Trump’s views about LGBTQ+ rights, and what exactly might he do?


Erase federal non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people

Trump’s first term was extremely detrimental to the rights and protections of LGBTQ+ people, and a second term could roll back protections once again.

LGBTQ+ people might no longer be guaranteed to be free of discrimination across several federal government programmes, such as Social Security, Medicare, housing and employment.

This would embolden and increase discrimination towards all queer people, but towards trans people in particular. Already, 53 per cent of LGBTQ+ people have reported experiencing discrimination because of their sexual orientation and 18 per cent due to their gender identity.


Exclude openly transgender people from the military

The first Trump administration reversed policies allowing trans people to serve in the military, and it is not difficult to foresee the president doing so again.

Another ban on trans people in the military would force out active-duty transgender service personnel as well as prevent trans people enlisting in the future.

This is despite a report in 2016 revealing that trans-inclusive policies have “little or no impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness”.

In fact, trans-inclusive military policies could benefit all active service members by “creating a more inclusive and diverse force.”

man in camo with a trans flag
Trans people could once again be banned from serving. (Getty)

Withhold federal funding if school officials affirm transgender students

Trump has said he would act to stop any school district introducing or maintaining trans-inclusive policies and practices.

This would include withholding federal funding that allow trans students to use toilets and changing rooms that align with their gender identity, or even acknowledging that they are trans, as well as arguing that trans-inclusive policies violate the rights of cisgender pupils.

Discrimination against trans students, causing significant harm to the community as a whole, would be the likely result of such a move.

Many trans children and teenagers already report feeling unsafe going to school because of bullying and mental-health distress.

@pinknews

Former President #DonaldTrump has said he will revoke protections for #trans people “on day one” if he is re-elected on November 5. Speaking to a right-wing radio talk show in Philadelphia, Trump spoke about President #JoeBiden ‘s recent enforcement of #TitleIX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the law banning discrimination based on sex in federally funded educational programs. The rule, which is set to go into effect August 1, protects the rights of trans and nonbinary students to go by their chosen pronouns and use the restrooms, locker rooms, and other facilities of their chosen gender identity. Trump said that if he is re-elected in the upcoming US Presidential Election, he will revokr these protections “on day one”. “Boys can go into girls’ locker rooms… the whole thing is crazy”. he said.”It’s like men playing in women’s sports… we’ll get that changed…. it’ll be signed on day one”. #transrights #protecttranskids #uspolitics #lgbtq

♬ original sound – PinkNews 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

Ban trans women from women’s sports

During a recent campaign rally, Trump said he was not going to “let” trans women compete in sporting events at all if he becomes president again.

He said invoking the ban would “not [be] a big deal”, citing recent sporting events in which trans women competed against cisgender women, claiming that the trans athlete had a competitive edge over their opponent.

“Physically, from a muscular standpoint… look at what’s happened in swimming. Look at the records that are being broken,” he said.


Prohibit gender-affirming care in federal healthcare programmes

Gender-affirming medical care is likely to be non-existent in a second Trump term. He has already pledged to “end left-wing gender insanity” and would outlaw federal funding for reassignment surgeries.

His website also promises that on his first day in the Oval Office, he would issue an executive order “instructing every federal agency to cease all programmes that promote the concept of sex and gender transition, at any age”.

The administration would also probably deny Medicaid funding for hospitals that provide gender-affirming care, forcing medics to deny trans people the care they require.

Access to healthcare for more than 100,000 transgender youngsters in 24 states has already been halted in the past three years.

@pinknews

During the second presidential debate last night, Donald Trump went on a bizarre rant about Kamala Harris wanting to “perform transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison”. #kamalaharris #donaldtrump #presidentialdebate #transrights #uselection

♬ original sound – PinkNews 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

Allow employers to discriminate against LGBTQ+ staff

A second Trump administration could bring in provisions to allow employers to discriminate against LGBTQ+ members of staff based on the boss’ stated religious beliefs, a reversal of existing non-discrimination laws.

This would not require congress or bipartisan support, and could be pushed through using an executive order from the president.

The administration could go one step further to prevent state and local governments enforcing non-discrimination laws if the defendant says the discrimination was based on religious belief.

Laws protecting LGBTQ+ people and other minorities from discrimination based on protected characteristics might also disappear.

Donald Trump
Donald Trump has continued to target the LGBTQ+ community. (Getty)

Criminalise gender-non-conformity in public life

Project 2025 – a hard-line right-wing blueprint for a future Republican president – suggests the use of criminal laws to punish gender-non-conformity in public life, with pornography being the crux of the issue.

The authors of the plan, the Heritage Foundation, inexplicably link pornography with “transgender ideology” and argue that neither has a “claim to First Amendment protection” and therefore should be outlawed.

“The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned,” they demand. “Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders, and telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be [closed down].”

That means any discussion of transgender people in schools and libraries could be criminalised, and trans people might face jail time for being themselves.

Trump would only be able to put this into practice with congress’ approval and there is unlikely to be bipartisan support for such a law, but even the slim possibility is terrifying.


Finally – could gay marriage be reversed?

Same-sex marriage supporter Vin Testa, of Washington DC, waves a rainbow pride flag near the Supreme Court
Same-sex marriage supporter Vin Testa, of Washington DC, waves a rainbow pride flag near the Supreme Court. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Unfortunately, yes, it could.

After crucial abortion legislation Roe v. Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court, many people said that next, they would be coming for Windsor and Obergefell and Lawrence – three rulings that unlocked a national right to same-sex marriage.

Whether a same-sex couple could marry varied by state before 2015. With its 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court extended the full federal right to marry to all same-sex couples.

So would – or could it be taken away? Many people think that the Supreme Court wouldn’t dare. Same-sex marriage is now too accepted in American society, they argue. It would cause “legal chaos.”

However, it remains the case that some justices, particularly Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, appear to be itching to overturn Obergefell. In 2022, Justice Thomas said the Supreme Court “should reconsider” its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage.

It’s important to remember in all of this Pride is a protest, and it continues to be. We can fight any and all of these attacks by standing up, speaking out and refusing to stay silent.

Share your thoughts! Let us know in the comments below, and remember to keep the conversation respectful.
 

How did this story make you feel?

Sending reaction...
Thanks for your feedback!

Please login or register to comment on this story.